Issue 3: September 2004

Win For Employers: High Court Limits Unions’ Right To Strike?

Employer groups have scored a significant victory with the High Court ruling that protected industrial action can only be taken in pursuit of claims about matters pertaining to the employment relationship (Electrolux Home Products Pty Ltd v Australian Workers' Union [2004]).

The decision stemmed from a strike by workers at Electrolux in 1999 in support of an enterprise agreement that required non-union members to pay unions an annual “bargaining agents’ fee” of $500. This fee was to be deducted from an employee’s wages by the company to pay for unions’ services in negotiating the enterprise agreement.

The High Court ruled that bargaining agents’ fees were outside the scope of the employment relationship and that the strike was therefore unlawful. It also ruled that any agreement that contained matters outside the employment relationship could not be certified by the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (“AIRC”), even if all other matters in the agreement were.

Ramifications of the decision
This decision means that unions are lawfully able to strike only during negotiations for an enterprise agreement in support of a narrow range of matters between a particular employer and its workers, relating to wages and employment conditions.

Importantly, the Court also ruled that union bargaining fees could not be included in industrial agreements as they do not pertain to the employment relationship. This hinders some union attempts to combat labour-market deregulation and declining union membership by including terms in enterprise agreements that rope back in non-union members and limit the use of contractors and casuals. The effect of this decision could be to prevent enterprise agreements including such terms.

Back to Top

 

The Federal Election – Shaping The Industrial Relations Landscape

“Chicken Littles…who squawk and flap that Labor has a radical industrial relations plan that will plunge Australia into the industrial dark ages as the sky is brought crashing to the earth”.

Shadow Minister for Workplace Relations Craig Emerson on the Coalition Government

“A pathetic retreat to the past”.

Prime Minister Howard on the ALP’s industrial relations reforms

With campaigning in the Federal election to be held on 9 October 2004 in full swing, it has been evident the result may depend on how the Australian public reacts to the differing industrial relations policies put forward by the Coalition Government and the ALP. All Australian employers ought to regard the issues surrounding the future of industrial relations as crucial to their continued operations. So what we can expect in the industrial relations arena if the Coalition Government is elected for its fourth term or if the ALP rise to power under PM Mark Latham?

Australian Industrial Relations Commission
The role of the Australian Industrial Relations Commission (“the AIRC”) in playing ‘umpire’ in industrial disputes may be greatly effected by the outcome of the election.

The Coalition:
• will seek to reduce the role the AIRC plays in industrial disputes;

• will enact legislation so that certified agreements can exist for a maximum of 5 years, rather than the current maximum of 3 years;

• will continue to push to exempt small business employers from the unfair dismissal regime; and

• may scrap the industrial award system altogether and replace it with a system of enterprise bargaining only, via certified agreements or individual workplace agreements.

The ALP:
• will seek to increase the role the AIRC plays in the industrial relations arena by promoting rights to bargain collectively (resulting in more certified agreements) and increasing the AIRC’s power to arbitrate industrial disputes; and

• will seek to abolish the current restrictions on what can be contained in industrial awards, commonly referred to as the ‘allowable award matters’.

Causal and Part-Time Employment
An employer’s ability to hire part-time and casual workers may be significantly curtailed if the Coalition loses the election.
The Coalition:

• will further encourage the use of casuals and part-timers, maintaining that such flexible employment arrangement have curbed strikes, stimulated productivity, lifted real wages and created new jobs.
The ALP:

• will introduce legislation to prevent “misuse” of causal employment. The ALP argue that the Coalition Government’s encouragement of casual labour has been an effort to undermine wages and conditions and to camouflage real unemployment rates; and

• will empower the AIRC to allow long-term casuals to take up permanent employment.

Australian Workplace Agreements
Australian Workplace Agreements (“AWAs”), the individual agreements that exclude the terms of an industrial award, will either become more widely used or otherwise be abolished altogether depending on the outcome of the election.

The Coalition:
• will streamline AWAs (presumably simplifying the approval process) and further promote use of AWAs, particularly in the private sector.

The ALP:
• consistent with its promotion of collective bargaining (via certified agreements), the ALP will introduce legislation to abolish AWAs, as well as the government body that approves AWAs, the Office of the Employment Advocate.

Worker Entitlements
As a result of a number of widely publicised corporate crashes in the last decade, both major parties have recognised the need to step in when an employer is unable to meet its obligations to pay employee entitlements.

The Coalition:
• will further promote the General Employee Entitlements and Redundancy Scheme (“GEERS”) which provides up to 16 weeks’ pay (including 8 weeks’ redundancy pay) where a business has insufficient assets available to pay the statutory entitlements of its workers.

The ALP:
• will abolish GEERS and introduce a national plan that guarantees 100% of employee entitlements, funded by a levy of 0.1% of payroll for businesses with more than 20 employees.

Use of Contractors
Employers using independent contractors on a wide scale may be forced to reconsider these arrangements post-election. Under a Latham Government, contractors may be given some of the benefits enjoyed by employees, such as access to the AIRC, minimum levels of remuneration and leave entitlements such as annual leave and sick leave. The Coalition has not released its policy on this issue.

The Role of the Senate?
The Howard Government well knows the frustration associated with the need to get the Senate’s approval to implement legislative change. In the last few years we have seen a series of Government bills defeated in the Senate because they have not been supported by the Democrats, who have held the balance of power.

Whichever party wins the Federal Election, their ability to influence the industrial relations landscape may depend on the composition of the Senate. Early signs are of a Democrat demise, leading to speculation that the Greens may hold the balance of power. That will be bad news for a Coalition Government in particular. Watch this space.

Back to Top

 

Common Rule Awards In Victoria From 1 January 2005

The workplace relations newsletter in February 2004 reported on the introduction of the common rule award system in Victoria. In the months that have passed the workings of the new system have become clearer and on 14 August 2004 the Australian Industrial Relations Commission formally commenced the process of declaring industrial awards having common rule in Victoria. The key points in the system for employers are as follows:

• Common rule awards will apply to Victorian employees who have previously been subject only to the five minimum conditions of employment set out in Schedule 1A of the Workplace Relations Act 1996.

• The most common types of employees affected by the new system will be clerical employees, administrative employees and those with IT related duties.

• To date there have been 11 awards declared by the Australian Industrial Relations Commission to have common rule. There are some 174 other awards now awaiting common rule declaration.

• Employees who become subject to a common rule award will gain entitlements such as overtime rates, 17.5 percent annual leave loading, award penalty payments and redundancy pay entitlements.

• The entitlements with be staggered in their implementation but most commence from 1 January 2005 in particular the obligation to pay the minimum award wages (including allowances and penalty payments) commences from the period on or after Monday 3 January 2005).

• Employers looking to implement more flexible arrangements than the award obligations should consider alternative options such as Certified Agreements or Australian Workplace Agreements.

If you have any further queries about the new system or want further details about agreements that are in place or award obligations please contact a member of our Workplace Relations team.

Workplace Relations & Employment Team

Paul Cooley - Senior Associate

Ph: +62 3 9608 2238

Fax: +61 3 9608 2220
Email: p.cooley@cornwalls.com.au

Louise Houlihan - Lawyer

Ph: +61 3 9608 2257
Fax: +61 3 9608 2220
Email: l.houlihan@cornwalls.com.au


Back to Top

This web site is intended to provide general information on legal issues and should not be relied upon as a substitute for legal or other professional advice. View our Privacy Policy Copyright © 2002 Cornwall Stodart Lawyers. All rights reserved.