In common with most transactions involving
a GST registered person, the sale of a business is generally
subject to GST unless the ‘supply of a going concern’ exemption
applies – in which case the sale will be GST-free.
Tort Law in Victoria is currently undergoing major statutory
change. The reform, collectively know as the Tort Law Reform
Package, is encompassed in three statutes:
The following is a brief summary of the
most significant changes.
-
When determining
whether the occupier of premises is liable for the injury
of a person entering those premises, consideration will
be given to whether the person entering the premises is
affected by alcohol or drugs and whether they are engaging
in any illegal activity.
-
An apology does not
constitute an admission of liability. Similarly, if injury
or death results as a consequence of a service, a reduction
or waiver of fees for that service will not be an admission
of liability.
-
Caps are placed on
damages for loss of earnings (maximum of three times average
weekly earnings) and non-economic loss (maximum of $371,
380.00, to be varied annually).
-
The discount rate
used to calculate future economic loss is 5%, unless a
different amount is prescribed by regulation.
-
Good Samaritans,
food donors and volunteers engaged in community work are
not liable for acts performed in good faith.
-
A Court may make
an Order, with agreement by the parties, for the payment
of all or part of damages to be made periodically, funded
by an annuity.
-
Providers of recreational
activities are able to limit their liability towards customers
through their terms of sale.
This Bill aims to encourage settlement of claims for damages
for death or injury, by establishing pre-litigation procedures.
The pre-litigation procedures in the Act contain strict timeframes.
The result of this is that each party is obliged to develop
their respective positions within a short period of time.
Under these procedures the Claimant must, firstly, provide
the Respondent with a Notice of Claim which details the injury,
medical treatment received and damages claimed. This Notice
may only be provided once the claimant’s medical practitioner
reports that the injury is stabilised.
Once the Respondent responds to the Notice and joins any further Respondents,
there is a full exchange of documents and relevant information between
all parties. Parties must then attend and participate in a conference
to resolve the claim. Each party must make written offers at this conference.
These written offers will become significant in relation to costs,
if the matter goes to trial.
A Claimant will only be able to commence proceedings if a settlement
is not reached at the compulsory conference.
The following table outlines who is to bear legal costs
at trial, where the costs awarded are less than $50,000.00
and the pre-trial procedures have been followed:
Claimant awarded less than $30,000.00 Claimant awarded between $30,000.00
and $50,000.00
Amount awarded is equal to, or more than, the Claimant’s final
written offer at compulsory conference Claimant entitled to costs on
solicitor/client basis from day proceeding commenced Claimant entitled
to costs on solicitor/client basis from day proceeding commenced, and
up to $2,500.00 for costs prior to the proceeding.
Amount awarded is equal to, or less than, the Respondent’s final
written offer at compulsory conference Respondent entitled to costs
on party/party basis from day proceeding commenced Respondent entitled
to costs on party/party basis from day proceeding commenced, and up
to $2,500.00 for costs prior to the proceeding.
Amount awarded is less than Claimant’s final written
offer, but more than Respondent’s final written offer
at compulsory conference Each party to bear their own costs
Claimant entitled to a maximum of $2,500.00 for costs prior
to the proceeding. Otherwise each party to bear their own
costs.
The changes will to some extent make claimants more accountable
for their own actions and limit in certain circumstances
the amount of damages payable. The new claim procedures will
require claimants to outline their case at an early stage
and may, in view of the cost provisions, lead to smaller
claims not being pursued.
Eventually, the reform should result in a reduction in public liability
insurance premiums, however this is not likely to occur in the short
term.
Written by Joe Naccarata